Chinese Ceramics & Antiques Discussion

Antique Chinese Ceramics => Chinese Ceramics Discussion => Topic started by: konniela on Jan 25, 2022, 05:02:01

Title: Guangxu
Post by: konniela on Jan 25, 2022, 05:02:01
Hello to everybody here, especially Peter and Stan. It's been a while, that I was here, so I am happy to see, everything is good here in these crazy times. And with what she comes back ? Yes, with boring rice grain. But have a look.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: konniela on Jan 25, 2022, 05:07:08
More photos
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: Stan on Jan 25, 2022, 05:39:16
Hi Konniela, nice plate, looks to me to be early 20th or late Guangxu, it would be nice to see a picture of the whole bottom, it could be later to, lets see what Peter thinks, Ive never seen one marked on the front like this very interesting.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: peterp on Jan 25, 2022, 08:39:45
This item is somewhat difficult to date. There is something odd about this.

The foot rim has a shape that we could expect from the Kangxi to Qianlong/Jiaqing reigns. It even has kiln grit adhering, which would be unlikely in the late Qing dynasty or republic period.
The mark is off center and has a slightly deviating trait in a stroke of the second character, which could mean that it is not from the Guangxu reign.

The rice grain pattern became popular in the late 18th century, if I remember right. The rim decoration of yours looks like some older ones, so more likely 19th century.

This "rice grain" pattern is often seen nowadays, as it is still being made. Those I have seen from the late Qing dynasty are often more like the modern ones, more simple decoration and mostly tea wares. Because of this I believe there is a good chance that this is from earlier in the 19th century, judging by the decoration and foot rim alone.

Now, if there is a Guangxu mark we usually would assume that the item must be of that period or later. I would try with a needle or a very sharp blade if the mark can easily be scratched away. If yes, it might be that it was added much later. (Why someone would want to add a mark of a later period is beyond me, however. Not knowing any earlier items of this pattern might be a reason. There weren't that many such items as nowadays, in the 19th century, probably.

The other possibility is more unlikely...namely someone took an old plate with a 18th century foot rim and painted it in the Guangxu reign. I'm aware that some such foot rims were made in the late Qing dynasty, but I doubt that any have kiln grit on them. The last kiln grit I know off on Chinese porcelain would be about Qianlong reign.

Now to the decoration details -- the characters inside are a word play "Yi Lu Lian Sheng", which has the auspicious meaning of climbing the official rank ladder smoothly. But the same reading of Yi Lu means 'one heron' and 'Lian' means Lotus. See the single heron and the lotus in the water...?

The decoration style looks as if it might be from Lilong kiln.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: Stan on Jan 25, 2022, 10:01:27
Hi Peter, I thought the sand might be a problem for late Qing but I wasn't sure, I have a set of nine plates with the rice grain, and 18th century bottoms with sand grit on the bottoms, I will post them on another post.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: konniela on Jan 26, 2022, 01:09:22
Not much time today, so sorry for late reaction. There are not much infomations at all to rice grain porcelain in books or online. I found a very similar plate,  should be described as guangxu mark and period in the book Allen`s introduction to later chinese porcelain. I don`t have this book, may be someone else here. I have made screenshots, but I don`t know, if I am allow to post them here. I am not able to scratch the mark, I really tried. One more photo from the whole bottom, the mark seems to be centered.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: peterp on Jan 26, 2022, 07:50:00
The decoration underneath the rim cannot be early 19th century, that might have been added later. Such decorations were made in the late Guangxu reign and republic period. It may have been added later and then a low-temperature firing was used to fix it.

I'm afraid that is the only reasonable explanation I can find for the discrepancy. A foot rim with grit is too difficult to explain as late as the Guangxu reign. Grit is related to the firing environment inside the kiln, and that should not be using any grit in the 19th century onwards.
We will have to leave this dating open, I'm afraid.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: JjGhandi on Feb 20, 2022, 23:31:32
Hello everyone!

I have no problem dating this to Guanxu.
I don't know why you state that kiln grit is atypical for the 19th century?

For me it's a giveaway. Kiln grit returned in the Guangxu period!
I have seen hundreds of late 19th century porcelains with kiln grit.

The specific reason for it, I wouldn't know. Perhaps further decline of quality after the opium wars, not being able to filter it out?

I really have seen so many Kangxi revival, export,... wares (mainly plates) of the Guangxu period containing kiln grit.

Kind regards,

JJ
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: peterp on Feb 21, 2022, 08:27:28
I have not...is it now that there are many? Some ten years ago there were virtually no Guangxu wares with grit.
Why not upload some pictures of wares with kiln sand, which you think are normal export? Might be interesting.

Grit of this type was virtually eliminated after the 18th century in Jingdezhen made items. While wares made in the late qing dynasty may have some lower quality than 18th century wares, grit is not among the quality problems, not as far as I have seen in the last decade. This includes the domestic China wares we see. Items were just not fired on kiln sand (grit) anymore.  The use of saggars made kiln sand superfluous.
I would suspect that those you see now might be copies or modifications made or modified after the end of the Qing dynasty, not in one of those period kiln settings. I would also like to point out that 18th century export ware, which had this type of slanted foot rim seldom shows this type of grit on JDZ made items as production quality was it its best; one sees it mostly (but infrequently) only on lower quality items made for the common folks during the Yongzheng reign. But apart from that it would have been prominent only on wares of certain late Ming kilns. It would be more likely if some other places refired some wares with modified decorations later. Some Canton export wares may have this type of rim and a little sand, but they were re-fired in Guangzhou (Canton) not Jingdezhen.

Hopefully you will show some pictures of wares you mentioned.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: konniela on Feb 22, 2022, 03:02:04
I am a little bit confused right now. No kiln grit in 19 century ? I have seen plates with kiln grit in books and on named auctions and I have three more plates 19 century, presented here in the past, with kiln grit. This one here is Tongzhi. I made these photos quickly, they are not best quality, sorry for that, but the grit is visible 
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: konniela on Feb 22, 2022, 03:03:20
Next is guangxu, small one
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: konniela on Feb 22, 2022, 03:04:20
one more guangxu, large one
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: konniela on Feb 22, 2022, 03:08:32
and one more just seen, famille rose (also presented here in the past)
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: konniela on Feb 22, 2022, 03:44:19
do you think, that it is possible, plates were fired in earlier time and decorared much later ? 
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: peterp on Feb 22, 2022, 08:14:23
> do you think, that it is possible, plates were fired in earlier time and decorated much later ? 

Yes, that is a fact. What I know is as follows:
1. The Canton wares (not sure if this only refers to enameled wares or also blue/white ones) were painted on blanks made at Jingdezhen, which then were transported to Canton (Guangzhou), where they were painted in the foreign factories. They were then fired at Guangzhou kiln, sometimes not only once, probably. That is because gilt must be fired at a lower temperature, so after painting the enamel colors there would be one firing, then after the gilt another firing at lower temperatures.
2. The 18th century type foot rim of your first item appears on items up to the Jiaqing reign or even early Daoguang, although it seems to have been fired only until the Qianlong reign. It appears there have been huge quantities of blanks stored which then were painted later. (I say it appears because there is not really much reliable information from the Chinese side; until now research of export wares has been largely neglected.)

The above is the reason I suspect your first item was initially fired in the early 19th century. The decoration style and character writing would support this, but the grit makes this doubtful in my view. The underside decoration is unlikely from that period, rather late Qing or early republic, probably.
I can reconcile that only by assuming that already existing plates were further decorated. Usually, this type of (rice grain) decoration is not very colorful, blue, red(dish) and gilt is most common. But it would be easy to add further colors later and fire them again. The later re-firing is where I suspect may be one opportunity for kiln grit to appear, but not in the original kiln. My personal view.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: peterp on Feb 22, 2022, 08:48:41
Please also note that I do not know where the rice grain pattern porcelain was made, or whether it was made in more than one place. Not necessarily in Jingdezhen. Actually, the style of the underglaze blue decoration might as well be from Liling kiln, which is nowadays one of the big kilns.
What I said about the grit and foot rim shapes is almost exclusively referring to Jingdezhen, as most everything that we talk about. Jingdezhen was the mainstream production area in the Qing dynasty, but Dehua was another large kiln and Canton wares were made exclusively for export. Other, minor southern kilns may have different conditions, but the foot rim looks as if it was originally fired at a JDZ kiln.

(Note) Just had a look at my items from Canton and Jingdhezhen and none of the 18th century Jingdezhen export plates had any grit (!), but all but the best of those from Canton had some grit in a position like yours, but less prominent, or a rough foot rim, both indicative of firing (quality) conditions differing from Jingdezhen. I'm afraid I never paid much attention to this.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: peterp on Feb 22, 2022, 09:16:23
I would like to comment on your other plates. This is my personal view and is the result of experience made here in the Far East.

The top plate (famille rose) is not from Jingdezhen. That is Canton enamel ware. It corresponds to wares as shown by the Guangzhou museum.
It is the first time I see a Kangxi mark, or any mark, on a Canton enamel plate.

Second plate from top (not export ware):
Not sure about this looking at these pictures. I have doubts about its authenticy. The decoration is a common late Qing, Guangxu decoration, but the blue mark is not written in regular Guangxu writing style.  Additionally, the character 'xu' of 'Guangxu' is written 绪, which is used in simplified Chinese, but it should be 緒, which is the traditional Chinese used in that period.
It looks also as if there is a worm-back foot rim, which would be found mostly on imperial ware, which would require a very neat round and smooth surface, top quality, and a different mark character style.

Third plate (not export ware):
From the picture of the bottom it looks as if the mark is off-center. Is it or does it only in the picture look that way? Questions remain in my view.

Fourth plate (not export ware):
This is probably among one of the best conditions in late Qing fencai porcelain I have seen, if it is late Qing. This should probably be from Jingdezhen and fencai. Again, the foot rim and mark position leave questions, but maybe it is all right.

And what concerns the kiln grit, am I right if I think the BW plates do not have the same grit as the the top one? And the plate may just be rough or something like sand is adhering? On the foot rim itself, not on the side, embedded inside the glaze?

Anyway, I would suggest to be careful, Jingdezhen imitations are getting better and better and will increase in future, as China has stopped exports of antiques. Sometimes it takes as little as a different character stroke or color hue to detect that an item is not of the period. We have to keep learning.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: peterp on Feb 22, 2022, 20:33:33
This is a good example of the proper writing style and character strokes for this mark.


Note:
Just to clarify for non-Chinese speakers what I wanted to point out regarding the 糹part of that xu character. While this abbreviated stroke part written as 纟may be found occasionally in handwritten texts, it was used as the basic and proper way of writing only from about the 1960s onward, when China introduced simplified character writing. It is not the proper way in marks of the Guangxu reign. This is in addition to the difference in mark writing style...not sure whether it means that the mark is not of the period, in this case.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: JjGhandi on Feb 23, 2022, 04:49:51
Hi Peter,


I need to correct myself. It seems that kiln grit in the Guangxu period mostly (if not only) appears on Canton wares. I'll post a few examples.
These are all Guangxu century made pieces, no 18th century blanks redecorated.
For me it is still clear (and a known fzct): kiln grit appears either pre-Qing or during the Guangxu period.


Kind regards,
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: JjGhandi on Feb 23, 2022, 05:00:00
The 200mb restriction is quite hard to work with so I uploaded the here:

ibb.co/mBYWmmV
ibb.co/9YtXxmN
ibb.co/7KZ5JZk
ibb.co/xm1CXj3
ibb.co/MBkQqW5
ibb.co/r5Ss19f

Kind regards,

JJ
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: peterp on Feb 23, 2022, 08:24:13
That is what I found too after viewing the Canton wares here; only few have no kiln grit at all.
So, it may really be due to the kiln environment during the second firing at the Guangzhou kiln.
The foot rim is also of the 18th century variety.

BTW, from the little bit of decoration visible of the item at ibb.co/xm1CXj3 ... I would suggest you inspect that further. While Canton enamels of this type have black outlines that were possibly transfer printed before painting the rest, the lines on this item are not thin and look as if they might be from a different period. They seem printed with the colors then filled in manually by brush.
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: konniela on Feb 26, 2022, 01:58:32
1. Try to resume for the rice grain plate: The plate may be fired in early 19 century and first decorated blue/white. Later (may be in late Qing) further decorated with colours for export. In comparison to other plates with such a foot rim, this plate here seems to be thicker and heavier. May be, this is not a good sign.

2.My examples for kiln grit seems to be not right, exept the famille rose plate. The other seems to have only sand on the foot rim. I would like to come back to them, but in a new topic. 
Title: Re: Guangxu
Post by: peterp on Feb 26, 2022, 08:09:40
Not sure if thickness is a factor for evaluation here. There isn't really that much rice grain pattern antiques around, especially of that age and size. New 20th century (and probably later) production of this type of porcelain is ongoing and we see modern ones all the time, mainly as tea wares, that is cups and dishes, but not larger pieces. And the mark was added later as it would make no sense to put a BW item with a red on-glaze mark. Blue marks are usually also underglaze blue, meaning that the plate would have had the mark at the same time painted and fired as the underglaze blue decoration.

Thanks also to Konniela and JjGhandhi for drawing my attention to the kiln sand problem. I think I will write a short article about its appearance on fakes and authentic antiques.