Print Page - Controversial plate

Title: Controversial plate
Post by: Stobaksov on Jan 20, 2018, 03:24:25

Hi, I'm not asking for myself. One person claims that this plate is 98 years old. I disagree. If you have time, please tell me who is right.

Title: Re: Controversial plate
Post by: konniela on Jan 20, 2018, 06:02:34

Looks modern to me, decoration and mark. I dont`t think, that this plate can be from republic period. I have seen similar marks from 1970, also on pieces from macau.

Title: Re: Controversial plate
Post by: heavenguy on Jan 20, 2018, 09:44:44

This plate is really really modern.

Title: Re: Controversial plate
Post by: Stobaksov on Jan 20, 2018, 12:42:54

Thank you for your opinion.

Title: Re: Controversial plate
Post by: Stobaksov on Jan 21, 2018, 18:06:38

And what is written on the mark?

Title: Re: Controversial plate
Post by: konniela on Jan 21, 2018, 19:00:33

The mark say : Da Qing Qianlong Nian Zhi, but it is not from the period of Qianlong.
The other three signs say : Made in Macau. I can not read chinese, but I found this kind of mark on gotheborg

Title: Re: Controversial plate
Post by: Stobaksov on Jan 21, 2018, 22:35:33

Thank you everybody!

Chinese Ceramics & Antiques Discussion

Antique Chinese Ceramics => Chinese Ceramics Discussion => Topic started by: Stobaksov on Jan 20, 2018, 03:24:25