Qianlong mark?

rgomes10 · Mar 05, 2019, 01:05:30

Can you help me with this mark?
Many thanks

peterp · Mar 05, 2019, 08:05:53

Yes Qianlong, but possibly apocryphal.

rgomes10 · Mar 05, 2019, 20:28:41

Thank you so much.
Does anyone else has information?
Thanks

peterp · Mar 05, 2019, 21:04:39

Please upload pictures of item, including bottom etc. We can only help if we have pictures. A mark is meaningless for identification or dating when it comes to Chinese porcelain.

rgomes10 · Mar 05, 2019, 22:33:10

Ok. Here are some more pictures. Thank you.

rgomes10 · Mar 05, 2019, 22:34:04

More pictures

Stan · Mar 06, 2019, 05:04:52

I believe that marks like this did exist in the Late Qing dynasty but the colors would suggest later in the 20th century in my opinion.

peterp · Mar 06, 2019, 10:19:27

The millefiori decoration would be right for Qing, but the base and underside decoration are something I have doubts about. In other words, the blue underside decoration is something I have never seen, and the double foot rim is not looking like other double rims of the Qing dynasty I know. Usually the second (inner) rim is not so much lower compared to the outer rim, and the rims themselves are a bit wider, as far as I know.
So, the likelihood that this is 20th century is higher. But in my view the millefiori decoration is of better quality than the average early 20th century ones. And it does not show the ground unlike some others.

rgomes10 · Mar 06, 2019, 18:39:50

Thank you so much